In today’s Nigeria
(and most African nations) its financial market is skewed in such a way that social
enterprises are totally left out of any financial incentive which these markets
churn out. Most traditional financial intermediaries in Nigeria, like banks,
are focused on short-term returns, and long term finances are only given to
established or blue-chip companies, with little and often no financial
incentives to social enterprises who they deem to be too risky for unsecured
lending. In unusual occasions if any financing is being offered by a bank, the
terms are often too arduous. As a result, social enterprises do not have the
cushion of external financing to manage their various capital requirements.
Like many small and medium scale enterprises, they need working capital to
balance out the peaks and troughs of their business cycle. Sometimes they need bridging
capital to pay for projects that are being personally – funded upon completion.
And for their long-term success and ability to scale, they need access to
development capital to fund capital investments and the development of new
income streams. This lack of affordable funding limits their ability to deliver
on their mission, hampers their ability to grow, and constrains their positive
impact on society.
It isn’t a fable
that Nigerian banks have an important role to play in the burgeoning Nigerian social
sector. And this role is far from what you might be thinking about. The
initiative explained here is a drift from the known practices and it is simple,
concise and would prove effective if it’s given a chance to breathe. There
hasn’t been a convincing financial model currently in place to finance the
largely high risk social enterprise in the country, so instead of trying to
develop a convincing business case to provide unsecured lending to higher-risk social
enterprises, as the case has always been, banks should use their own philanthropic
capital to finance social enterprises; which are visionary and creditable and in
search of funds to develop their ideas, so as to address this market failure.
To bridge the gap
between traditional bank loans and onerous grant funding (now done by the
government through the You Win scheme), banks can provide capital in the form of
long-term unsecured loans to social enterprises by using a fraction of their
corporate social responsibility (CSR) fund. Banks’ philanthropic capital can be
used to offer unsecured loans ranging from N25, 000 to N250, 000 or more depending
on the capacity and/or potential of the enterprise. A single digit default interest
rate could be fixed for such unsecured loans, so as to free it from the ever
fluctuating monetary policy rates.
This is an
innovative way for banks to achieve greater impact on the social scene and also
to complement the resourcefulness and tenacity of social entrepreneurs. Banks’
philanthropic capital can then be “recycled” in the form of loans to different social
enterprises over and over again, thereby achieving exponential impact over a
one-off donation. When these banks make an investment using their philanthropic
capital, i.e. what they would otherwise give away as a one-off donation, it
wouldn’t just fizzle-out, but would generate new income streams which can be
used to deal out more unsecured loan to a social enterprise. It will naturally develop
into a continuous cycle when that social enterprise pays back, and money is
then loaned out again to another social enterprise — over and over — until we eventually
have a stream of funds which can be used to even finance huge capital projects.
Hence, instead of making a one-off donation in the name of CSR, which is likely
not have a desirable impact on the immediate needs of the society; of which
job-creation tops the list, banks can “invest” through this model, where it is
guaranteed the funds are ‘recycled’ as loan to social enterprises over and over
and it achieves a much greater impact.
Of course, this
is easier said than achieved. Internally, this approach requires recruiting skilled
financial analysts with great people skills, since one hour they may be meeting
a small community group, or a fervent individual and the next they may be
structuring a corporate finance-type deal. These people are hard enough to come
by; finding top talent who are also willing to forgo profit sector salaries is
even tougher. There are also external challenges. While social entrepreneurs
and nonprofit leaders are often smart, passionate visionaries, they may not
have had any formal commercial training. As a result, reporting quality and
skill levels often vary. Unlike the standardized processes and products of
traditional banks, lending to higher risk social enterprises requires customized
application processes, careful due diligence, and tailor-made lending offers.
It is time and resource intensive.
In the current
Nigerian banking atmosphere bank executives are under increasing scrutiny to demonstrate
the “good side” of banking by the public and government. Innovation in social
financing should be an integral part of that story. Banks already have the necessary
evaluation processes, highly skilled talent, and global reach. And they also
have sophisticated corporate philanthropy and CSR programs. By combining the
two in a new unsecured-lending-to-social enterprise model, banks could achieve
much more social impact than they are today. To be clear, this is not about a new
banking product within their existing profit structures. Nor is this about developing
another socially responsible investment (SRI) product for their customers. This
is about generating greater social returns on their own philanthropy investment
by offering unsecured loans to social enterprises that would otherwise not have
access to capital. Strategic corporate philanthropy requires bank executives to
take a hard look at the skills and resources they have in their organizations,
to mobilize these skills and resources to achieve the greatest social impact,
and to act boldly, especially when they can do what others can’t. Anything less
falls short.
Please follow me on twitter @IykeDexter
No comments:
Post a Comment